Везде
The Conception of Co-dependent Arising (pratītya samutpāda) in Pāli Canon
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
The Conception of Co-dependent Arising (pratītya samutpāda) in Pāli Canon
Annotation
PII
S000523100001905-9-1
DOI
10.31857/S000523100001905-9
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Anastasiya V. Lozhkina 
Occupation: Postgraduate student
Affiliation: History of Foreign Philosophy Department, faculty of Philosophy, Lomonosov Moscow State University
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Edition
Issue 11
Pages
202-212
Abstract

Pāli canon may show us patterns of philosophy concepts’ developing in the early Buddhist textual tradition. Special sections of article are devoted to characteristics of nidāna in Buddhist texts and to problem of possibility of pratītya samutpāda formal notation. In the end of article author writes about the contemporary research position on deference between Buddhist notion of causality and European approach. In view of interpretation of all these aspects of pratītya samutpāda investigation the author makes a conclusion about philosophical significance of this fundamental theoretical principle in the Buddhist religious and philosophical system. 

Keywords
early Buddhism, causality, pratītya samutpāda, nidāna, schools of early Buddhism, Pāli canon, bodhi
Received
18.12.2018
Date of publication
19.12.2018
Number of purchasers
10
Views
786
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References

1. Catuṣpariṣatsūtra 2008 – Catuṣpariṣatsūtra ed. by J. Gippert, Frankfurt, 2008, http://titus.uni-frankfurt.de/texte/etcs/ind/aind/bskt/cps/cps.htm

2. Kathāvatthu 1891 – Kathāvatthu ed. by A.C.Taylor, London: Pali Text Society, Oxford University Press, 1891.

3. The Kathāvatthu 1961 – The Kathāvatthu, general editor Bhikkhu J. Kashyap, Pali Publication Board (Bihar Government), 1961.

4. Bucknell, R.S. (1999) Conditioned Arising Evolves: Variation and Change in Textual Accounts of the Paṭicca-sammuppāda Doctrine // JIABS, v. 22, № 2, pp. 311–342.

5. Bareau, A. (2005) Buddhist Sects of the Lesser Vehicle, tr. by G.M. Chodron, https://suvacobhikkhu.wordpress.com/buddhist-sects/

6. Dependent Origination (2016), web., Barre Centre for Buddhist Studies. 8-10 April, 2016, http://www.leighb.com/Dobcbs.pdf

7. Lamotte, E. (1980) Conditioned Co-production and Supreme Enlightenment // Balasooriya, S, Bareau, A., Gombrich, R., Gunasinghe, S., Mallawarachchi, U., Perry, E. (ed.), Buddhist Studies in Honour of Walpola Rahula, Gordon Fraser Gallery, London, pp. 118–132.

8. Lysenko, Victoria G., Terentiev, Andrey A., Shohin, Vladimir K. (1994) Early Buddhist Philosophy. Jaina Philosophy, Vostochnaya Literatura RAN, Moscow (in Russian).

9. Kalupahana, David J. (1975) Causality: The Central Philosophy of Buddhism, Honolulu.

10. Macy, J.R. (1979) Dependent Co-arising: The Distinctiveness of Buddhist Ethics // The Journal of Religious Ethics, vol. 7, № 7 (Spring, 1979), pp. 38–52.

11. Rhys-Davids, T.W. (2005) Pali-English Dictionary, Chicago. Articles Paccaya, p. 712, Paṭicca-samuppāda, p. 730.

12. Ronkin, N. (2005) Early Buddhist Metaphysics. The Making a Philosophical Tradition, Oxford centre for Buddhist studies, Routledge Curzon, chapter 5 Causation as the handmaid of metaphysics: from the paṭiccasamuppāda to Paṭṭhāna, pp. 193–244.

13. Stcherbatsky, Fyodor. I. (1988) Selected Works on Buddhism. Nauka, Moscow (in Russian).

14. Vertogradova, V. (1990) Clay Tablets with Indian Texts from Khisht-Tepa // International Association for the Study of Culture of Central Asia. Information Bulletin, № 17, pp. 21–31.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate