Везде
Artificial entrepreneurial ecosystems as a regional business environment reconfiguration factor
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Artificial entrepreneurial ecosystems as a regional business environment reconfiguration factor
Annotation
PII
S020736760009170-6-
DOI
10.31857/S020736760009170-6
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
N. Solodilova 
Affiliation: Institute of Economics and Service of the Ufa State Petroleum Technological University
Address: Russian Federation
R. Malikov
Affiliation: Institute of Economics and service of Ufa state oil technical University
Address: Russian Federation
C. Grishin
Affiliation: Institute of Economics, Finance and business, Bashkir State University
Address: Russian Federation
Edition
Issue 4
Pages
38-55
Abstract

The article proposes to use an ecosystem approach to the study of regional entrepreneurship, which allows you to focus on the specific spatio-temporal context of entrepreneurship development, taking into account the nature of the interactions of economic agents and their relationships with business environment.

A mathematical model is proposed that is based on the evaluation of the function of the ratio of business profit growth resulting from the formation of a specific environment in artificial entrepreneurial ecosystems to the total operational  costs incurred by the business entity. A model has been developed for assessing the benefits of a resident entrepreneur’s entering an artificial entrepreneurial ecosystem.

 

Keywords
entrepreneurship, region, business environment, ecosystem approach, entrepreneurial ecosystems, conventionally natural entrepreneurial ecosystems, artificial entrepreneurial ecosystems, regional context, institutional configuration, reconfiguration
Acknowledgment
The study was financially supported by the Russian Federal Property Fund and the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Bashkortostan in the framework of the scientific project No. 18-410-020001 «Reconfiguration of the business ecosystem as a factor in increasing business and investment activity in the region».
Received
01.03.2020
Date of publication
06.05.2020
Number of purchasers
37
Views
1770
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S020736760009170-6-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 08.04.2020
Cite   Download pdf

References

1. Chepurenko A. Sovmeschaya universal'nye kontseptsii s natsional'noj spetsifikoj: podderzhka malogo i srednego predprinimatel'stva // Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal'nogo upravleniya. 2017. № 1. S. 7-30.

2. Wright M., Stigliani I. Entrepreneurship and growth // International Small Business Journal. 2012. Vol. 1(1), Rr. 3-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0266242612467359

3. Shane S., Venkataraman S. The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research // Academy of Management Review. 2000. Vol. 25, R. 217-226.

4. Aldrich H. Entrepreneurial Strategies in New Organizational Populations. Entrepreneurship / An Interdisciplinary Perspective, R. Swedberg (ed.) // Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2000. Rr. 211-228.

5. Moore J. Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition // Harvard Business Review. 1993. № 71. Rr. 76–86.

6. Audretsch D., Cunningham, J.A., Kuratko, D., Lehmann E. Menter M. Entrepreneurial ecosystems: economic, technological, and societal impacts // The Journal of Technology Transfer. 2019. Vol. 44 (4). Rr. 313 – 325 .

7. Gossain S., Kandiah G. Reinventing Value: The New Business Ecosystem // Strategy& Leadership. 1998. Vol. 26 (5). Rr. 28–33.

8. Lewin R., Regine B. On the Edge in the World of Business / In: Lewin R. Complexity: Life at the Edge of Chaos // The University of Chicago Press.1999. Rr. 197–211.

9. Galateanu E., Avasilcai S. Business ecosystem architecture // Annals of the Oradea University. 2013. -Issue 1. Rr. 79–84.

10. Acs Z., Audretsch D., Lehmann E., Licht G. National Systems of Entrepreneurship // Small Business Economics. 2016.Vol. 16.№ 4. Rr. 527–535. DOI: 10.1007/s11187-016-9705-1.

11. Spigel B. The Relational Organization of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems // Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2017. Vol. 41(1). Pr. 49-72.

12. Audretsch D., Belitski M. Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: establishing the framework conditions // Journal of Technology Transfer. 2017.Vol. 42 (5). Pr. 1030-1051. DOI: org/10.1007/s10961-016-9473-8

13. Stam E. Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: a sympathetic critique // European Planning Studies. 2015.Vol. 23(9). Rr. 1759-1769.

14. Feldman M. The Entrepreneurial Event Revisited: Firm Formation in a Regional Context // Industrial and Corporate Change. 2001.Vol. 10. № 4. Pr. 861–891.

15. Sternberg R. Do EU Regional Policies Favour Regional Entrepreneurship? Empirical Evidence from Spain and Germany // European Planning Studies. 2012. Vol. 20(4) Rr. 583-608.

16. Dahl M., Sorenson O. The embedded entrepreneur // European Management Review. 2009. Vol. 6(3). Pr. 172–181.

17. Dahl M., Sorenson O. Home sweet home: entrepreneurs location choices and the performance of their ventures // Management Science. 2012.Vol. 58(6). Pr. 1059–1071.

18. Figueiredo O., Guimaraes P., Woodward D. Homefield advantage: location decisions of Portuguese entrepreneurs // Journal of Urban Economics. 2002. Vol. 52 (2) Rr. 341-361.

19. Shane S. Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities // Organization Science. 2000. Vol. 11(4). Rr. 448–469. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.11.4.448.14602

20. Westlund H., Bolton R. Local social capital and ent-repreneurship // Small Business Economics. 2003. Vol. 21 (2), Rr. 77–113. DOI: org/10.1023/A:1025024009072

21. Audretsch D, Feldman M. R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production // American Economic Review. 1996. Vol. 86 (3) Pr. 630-640.

22. Boschma R., Lambooy J. Evolutionary economics and economic geography // Journal of Evolutionary Economics.1999.Vol. 49 (4). Pr. 411-429.

23. Okamuro H., Kobayashi N. The impact of regional factors on the start-up ratio in Japan // Journal of Small Business Management. 2006.Vol. 44(2). Rr. 310–322.

24. Thurik R., Stam E., Audretsch D. The Rise of the Entrepreneurial Economy and the Future of Dynamic Capitalism // Technovation. 2013.Vol. 33(8-9) Rr. 302-310.

25. Baumol W. Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive // Journal of Political Economy. 1990.Vol. 98 (5). Pr. 893-921.

26. Colombo M., Dagnino G., Lehmann E., Salmador M. The governance of entrepreneurial ecosystems // Small Business Economics. 2019. Vol. 52(2). Pr. 419–428.

27. Holmes R., Miller T., Hitt, M., Salmador, M. The Interrelationships Among Informal Institutions, Formal Institutions, and Inward Foreign Direct Investment // Journal of Management. 2013. Vol. 39(2). Rr. 531-566.

28. Degtyarev A., Malikov R., Grishin K. Institutsional'naya konfiguratsiya regional'noj delovoj sredy: parametry proektirovaniya // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 2014. № 11. S. 83–94.

29. Efremenko V. Sistemnyj analiz «Territorij sotsial'no-ehkonomicheskogo razvitiya» // Vlast' i upravlenie na Vostoke Rossii. 2017. №1 (78). S. 18–19.

30. Solodilova N., Malikov R., Grishin K. Prognozirovanie investitsionnogo potentsiala predprinimatel'stva v regione // Obschestvo i ehkonomika: Nauchno-prakticheskij zhurnal. 2016. № 3. S. 79-95.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate