Везде
Adaptation of G. Shmidt’s scale for job apathy
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Adaptation of G. Shmidt’s scale for job apathy
Annotation
PII
S020595920007904-0-
DOI
10.31857/S020595920007904-0
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
A. Zolotareva 
ORCID: 0000-0002-5724-2882
Occupation: Research fellow, International laboratory of positive psychology of personality and motivation
Affiliation: National Research University Higher School of Economics
Address: Moscow, Myasnickaya str., b., 20
Edition
Volume 41 Issue 2
Pages
115-126
Abstract

The results of adaptation of Russian-language version of G. Shmidt’s scale for professional apathy are presented. On the sample of 275 employees of “Courier Service Express” organization it has been shown that adapted scale makes it possible to measure apathic thoughts (lack of interest and emotional loyalty for work in organization) and apathic actions (lack of tendency in realization of actions necessary for successful decision of work tasks). High reliability of Russian-language version of scale has been demonstrated: Cronbach's alpha for apathic thoughts scale is 0.86 and 0.73 – for apathic actions scale. Validity of the adapted scale has been confirmed by direct correlation of professional apathy with professional burnout and experiencing of nothingness in professional activity and by reverse one with dedication and satisfaction with job and experiencing of gratification and meaning in professional activity. It has been demonstrated that employees’ apathic thoughts do not depend on socio-demographic characteristics while apathic actions depend on age, family status and dependence of family financial state from an employee.

Keywords
Professional apathy, professional burnout, experiencing in professional activity, dedication to job, satisfaction with job
Received
13.12.2019
Date of publication
04.03.2020
Number of purchasers
28
Views
1083
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S020595920007904-0-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 12.12.2019
Cite   Download pdf

References

1. Vodop'janova N.E., Starchenkova E.S. Sindrom vygoranija: diagnostika i profilaktika. St.-Petersburg: Piter, 2008. (in Russian)

2. Zolotareva A.A. Razrabotka i aprobacija novoj psihologicheskoj shkaly apatii // Materialy V Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii “Aktual'nye voprosy psihologii zdorov'ja i psihosomaticheskoj discipliny” (g. Mahachkala, 14 nojabrja 2017 g.). Mahachkala: Dagestanskij gosudarstvennyj medicinskij universitet, 2017. P. 86–91. (in Russian)

3. Ivanova T.Ju., Rasskazova E.I., Osin E.N. Struktura i diagnostika udovletvorennosti trudom: razrabotka i aprobacija metodik // Organizacionnaja psihologija. 2012. V. 2. № 3. P. 2–15. (in Russian)

4. Kutuzova D.A. Organizacija dejatel'nosti i stil' samoreguljacii kak faktory professional'nogo vygoranija pedagoga-psihologa: dis… kand. psihol. nauk. Moscow, 2006. (in Russian)

5. Lovakov A.V. Psihometricheskij analiz russkojazychnoj versii Gollandskoj shkaly trudovoj zavisimosti (DUWAS) // Organizacionnaja psihologija. 2016. V. 6. № 3. P. 22–37. (in Russian)

6. Osin E.N., Leont'ev D.A. Diagnostika perezhivanij v professional'noj dejatel'nosti: validizacija metodiki // Organizacionnaja psihologija. 2017. V. 7. № 2. P. 30–51. (in Russian)

7. Chiksentmihaji M. Potok: psihologija optimal'nogo perezhivanija. Moscow: Smysl; Al'pina Non-fikshn, 2011. 464 p. (in Russian)

8. Blau G., Boal K. Conceptualizing how job involvement and organizational commitment affect turnover and absenteeism // Academy of Management Review. 1987. V. 15. № 1. P. 115–127.

9. Griffeth R.W., Gaertner S., Sager J.K. A taxonomic model of withdrawal behavior: The adaptive response model // Human Resource Management Review. 1999. V. 9. № 4. P. 557–590.

10. Hu L., Bentler P.M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives // Structural Equation Modeling. 1999. Vol. 6. P. 1–55.

11. Krach S.K., McCreery M.P., Guerard J. Cultural-linguistic test adaptations: Guidelines for selection, alteration, use, and review // School Psychology International. 2017. V. 38. № 1. P. 3–21.

12. Ladebo O.J. Effects of work-related attitudes on the intention to leave the profession: An examination of school teachers in Nigeria // Emotional Management Administration and Leadership. 2005. V. 33. № 3. P. 355–369.

13. Loewenthal K.M. An introduction to psychological tests and scales (2 ed.). Hove, UK: Psychology Press, 2001.

14. Maslach C., Jackson S.E., Leiter M. The Maslach Burnout Inventory manual. In C.P. Zalaquett, R.J. Wood (Eds.), Evaluating stress: A book of resources (pp. 191–218). The Scarecrow Press, 1997.

15. Schaufeli W.B., Bakker A.B., Salanova M. The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study // Educational and Psychological Measurement. 2006. V. 66. № 4. P. 701–716.

16. Schaufeli W.B., Taris T.W., Bakker A. Dr. Jekyll and Mr.Hide: On the differences between work engagement and workaholism. In R. Burke (Ed.), Research companion to working time and work addiction (193–217). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2006.

17. Schmidt G.B., Park G., Keeney J., Ghumman S. Job apathy: Scale development and initial validation // Journal of Career Assessment. 2017. V. 25. № 3. P. 484–501.

18. Spector P.E. Relationships of organizational frustration with reported behavioral reactions of employees // Journal of Applied Psychology. V. 60. № 5. P. 635–637.

19. Spence J.T., Robbins A.S. Workaholism: Definition, measurement, and preliminary results // Journal of Personality Assessment. 1992. V. 58. № 1. P. 160–178.

20. Vanagas G., Bihari-Axelsson S., Vanagienė V. Do age, gender and marital status influence job strain development for general practioner? // Medicina (Kaunas). 2004. V. 40. № 10. P. 1014–1018.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate