Везде
THE RECOGNITION DYNAMICS FOR UNNOTICED MEANINGS OF AMBIGUOUS FIGURES
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
THE RECOGNITION DYNAMICS FOR UNNOTICED MEANINGS OF AMBIGUOUS FIGURES
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000329-8-1
DOI
10.31857/S20000329-8-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
MARIA MEZENTSEVA  DARYA KOSTINA MARGARITA FILIPPOVA
Abstract
The focus of this paper is the problem of selection of some meanings of ambiguous information tobecome aware of, and the problem of subsequent influence of unnoticed meanings on recognition processes.For the purpose of experimental verification of the idea that there is a dynamics of recognition of unnoticedmeanings of ambiguous images, two experiments were conducted. The ambiguous images and reversiblepictures were used as stimuli for memorization which had to be recognized immediately after presentation,the next day, a week and a month later. We tested the hypothesis according to which previously unnoticedmeanings of ambiguous images tend to penetrate into consciousness as recognition errors in the course oftime. The experimental results are consistent with the hypothesis: a month after the presentation the numberof recognition errors for inverted characters of the reversible pictures reached 71.2%; the number of falserecognition errors for descriptions of noticed meanings of ambiguous images with elements of alternativemeanings reached 67,8% (both values are significantly different from those in control conditions). Thecomparison of several theoretical approaches to polysemy perception allows us to conclude that the bestexplanation for the obtained results can be proposed by the negative choice theory. This theory postulatesthat unnoticed polysemy interpretations show themselves in two ways: they are missed repeatedly in the samecontext but penetrate into consciousness as errors when context changes.
Keywords
ambiguous figures, reversible figures, unnoticed meanings, inhibition, negative choice, recogni- tion errors.
Number of purchasers
8
Views
640
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

    

  1. Allahverdov V.M. Opyt teoreticheskoj psihologii. St. Petersburg: Pechatnyj dvor, 1993. (in Russian)
    2. 

  2. Allahverdov V.M. Soznanie kak paradoks. St. Petersburg: DNK, 2000. (in Russian)
    3. 

  3. Mamina T. M. Vlijanie smyslovogo fona na vosproizvedenie i uznavanie slov-omonimov // Vestnik SPbGU. Ser. 12. 2011. Iss. 4. P. 137–144. (in Russian)
    4. 

  4. Filippova M.G. Rol’ neosoznavaemyh znachenij v processe vosprijatija mnogoznachnyh izobrazhenij : Dis. ... kand. psihol. Nauk. St. Petersburg, 2006. (in Russian)
    5. 

  5. Filippova M.G., Moroshkina N.V. Osoznavaemaja i neosozna- vaemaja mnogoznachnost’: dva vida kognitivnogo kontrol- ja // Sibirskij psihologicheskij zhurnal. 2015. № 56. P. 37–55. (in Russian)
    6. 

  6. Brocher A., Koenig J.P. Word meaning frequencies af- fect negative compatibility effects in masked prim- ing // Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 2016. V. 12. № 1. P. 50–67.
    7. 

  7. Clark A. Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science // Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2013. V. 36. № 3. P. 181–204.
    8. 

  8. Dehaene S., Changeux J.P. Experimental and theoreti- cal approaches to conscious processing // Neuron. 2011. № 70. Р. 200–227.
    9. 

  9. DeSchepper B., Treisman A. Visual Memory for Novel Shapes: Implicit Coding Without Attention // Learning, Memory. 1996. V. 22. № 1. P. 27–47.
    10. 

  10. Eagle M., Wolitzky D.L., Klein G.S. Imagery: effect of a concealed figure in stimulus // Science. 1966. V. 151. P. 838–839.
    11. 

  11. Eckstein D., Kubat M., Perrig W.J. Visible homonyms are ambiguous, subliminal homonyms are not: A close look at priming // Consciousness and cognition. 2011. V. 20. № 4. P. 1327–1343.
    12. 

  12. Elkind D. Ambiguous Pictures for Study of Perceptu- al Development and Learning // Child Development. 1964. V. 35. P. 1391–1396.
    13. 

  13. Fernberger S.W. An early example of a “hidden-figure” picture // American Journal of Psychology. 1950. V. 63. P. 448–449.
    14. 

  14. Filippova M.G. Does Unconscious Information Affect Cognitive Activity: A Study Using Experimental Prim- ing // The Spanish Journal of Psychology. 2011. V. 14. № 1. P. 20–36.
    15. 

  15. Fisher G.H. Ambiguous figure treatments in the art of Salvador Dali // Perception and Psychophysics. 1967. V. 2. P. 328–330.
    16. 

  16. Frings C., Schneider K.K., Fox E. The negative priming paradigm: An update and implications for selective at- tention // Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2015. V. 22. № 6. P. 1577–1597.
    17. 

  17. Friston K.J. Prediction, perception and agency // Inter- national Journal of Psychophysiology. 2012. V. 83. № 2. P. 248–252.
    18. 

  18. Hill W.E. My wife and my mother-in-law // Puck. 1915. P. 11.
    19. 

  19. Hohwy J. The self-evidencing brain // Noûs. 2016. V. 50. № 2. P. 259–285.
    20. 

  20. Hohwy J. The predictive mind // New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 2013. P. 288.
    21. 

  21. Jueptner M., Weiller C. Review: Does measurement of regional cerebral blood flow reflect synaptic activity? Implications for PET and FMRI // Neuroimage. 1995. V. 2. P. 148–156.
    22. 



 


    

  1. Logothetis N.K. What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI // Nature. 2008. V. 453. № 7197. P. 869–878.
    2. 

  2. Marcel A.J. Selective effects of prior context on percep- tion // In Requin J. Anticipation and behavior. 1980. P. 412–430.
    3. 

  3. May C.P., Kane M.J., Hasher L. Determinants of Nega- tive Priming // Psychological Bulletin. 1995. V. 118. № 1. P. 35–54.
    4. 

  4. Neill W.T. Episodic retrieval in negative priming and repetition priming // Journal of Experimental Psychol- ogy: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1997. V. 23. P. 1291–1305.
    5. 

  5. Neill W.T., Valdes L., Terry K.M., Gorfein D.S. The per- sistence of negative priming: II. Evidence for episod- ic trace retrieval // Journal of Experimental Psychol- ogy: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1992. V. 18. P. 993–1000.
    6. 

  6. Ortells J.J., Abad M.J., Noguera C., Lupiáñez J. Influence of Prime–probe Stimulus Onset Asynchrony and Prime Precuing Manipulations on Semantic Priming Effects With Words in a Lexical-decision Task // Journal of Ex- perimental Psychology: Human Perception and Perfor- mance. 2001. V. 27. № 1. P. 75–91.
    7. 

  7. Peterson M.A., Cacciamani L., Mojica A.J., Sanguinet- ti J.L. Meaning can be accessed for the ground side of a figure // Journal of Gestalt Theory, 2012. V. 34. № 3, P. 297–314.
    8. 

  8. Peterson M.A., Kim J.H. On what is bound in figures and grounds // Visual Cognition, 2001. № 8. P. 329–348.
    9. 

  9. Reber R., Fazendeiro T.A., Winkielman P. Processing flu- ency as the source of experiences at the fringe of con- sciousness // Psyche. 2002. V. 8. Iss.10. P. 1–21.
    10. 

  10. Reber R., Schwarz N., Winkielman P. Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: is beauty in the perceiver’s pro- cessing experience? // Personality and Social Psycholo- gy Review. 2004. № 8. P. 364–382.
    11. 

  11. Simpson G.B., Burgess C. Activation and Selection Pro- cesses in the Recognition of Ambiguous Words // Jour- nal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1985. V. 11. № 1. P. 28–39.
    12. 

  12. Sumner P., Brandwood T. Oscillations in motor prim- ing: Positive rebound follows the inhibitory phase in the masked prime paradigm // Journal of motor behavior. 2008. V. 40. № 6. P. 484–490.
    13. 

  13. Tagamets M.A., Horwitz B. Interpreting PET and fMRI measures of functional neural activity: the effects of synaptic inhibition on cortical activation in human imag- ing studies. Brain Research Bulletin. 2001. Vol. 54. № 3. P. 267–273.
    14. 

  14. Tal А., Bar M. The proactive brain and the fate of dead hypotheses // Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 2014. V. 8. № 3. Р. 1–6.
    15. 

  15. Tipper S.P. Does negative priming reflect inhibito- ry mechanisms? A review and integration of conflicting views // The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychol- ogy. 2001. V. 54. № 2. P. 321–343.
    16. 

  16. Tipper S.P. The negative priming effect: Inhibitory prim- ing by ignored objects // Journal of Experimental Psy- chology. 1985. V. 37. P. 571–590.
    17. 

  17. Tipper S.P., Weaver B., Cameron S., Brehaut J.C., Bast- edo J. Inhibitory mechanisms of attention in identifi- cation and localization tasks: time course and disrup- tion // Journal of experimental psychology: learning, memory, and cognition. 1991. V. 17. № 4. P. 681–692.
    18. 

  18. Treisman A., DeSchepper B. Object tokens, attention, and visual memory / In T. Inui J. McClelland (Eds.), Atten- tion and performance, XVI: Information integration in perception and communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.1996. Р. 15–46.
    19. 

  19. Van Petten C., Kutas M. Ambiguous words in context: An event-related potential analysis of the time course of meaning activation // Journal of Memory and Language. 1987. V. 26. № 2. P. 188–208.
    20.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate