Phenomenological analysis of term “antaryamin” in Bhaskara’s Philosophy
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Phenomenological analysis of term “antaryamin” in Bhaskara’s Philosophy
Annotation
PII
S004287440005745-4-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Ruzana Pskhu 
Affiliation: RUDN
Address: Russian Federation
Anna Shiyan
Affiliation: Russian State University for the Humanities
Address: Russian Federation
Lyudmila Kryshtop
Affiliation: RUDN
Address: Russian Federation
Andrey V. Paribok
Affiliation:
Address: Russian Federation
Edition
Pages
198-211
Abstract

The article presents a comparative analysis of such different traditions of philosophical thought as Indian and European traditions of philosophy. The article deals with the problem of relationship between Brahman and the world, Brahman and the individual soul. This problem has been solved in Indian philosophy in the different ways – from monism of Shankara (in the 8th century) to dualism of Madhva (in the 13th century). Meanwhile there were Ramanuja and Bkaskara who have also tried to find the decision for this ontological problem. The article gives special consideration to the analyses of Bkaskara’s philosophical views, according to which Brahman can be regarded both as a having the same essence with the world and individual soul and as a having the divergent one. It depends on the way we consider and interpret the notions of identity and difference, avidya and maya. 

On the base of the comparison of Bkaskara’s argumentation for identity and divergence at the same time of Brahman and the world with the method of transcendental reduction of Husserl the authors conclude the methods of phenomenology can be successfully applied to comprehension of different aspects of philosophical thoughts of other cultural regions such for example Indian philosophy. The article demonstrates also the fact that we can describe by means of phenomenological language the other East European philosophical traditions such as Kantian one. 

Keywords
Brahman, individual soul, world, phenomenology, Husserl, Shankara, Bkaskara, phenomenological reduction
Acknowledgment
The study is supported by Russian Science Foundation grant “Indian Philosophy in the History of World Philosophy Context: the Meanings’ Translation Problem”, project No 16-18-10427
Received
28.07.2019
Date of publication
28.07.2019
Number of purchasers
89
Views
1060
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S004287440005745-4-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 04.07.2019
Cite   Download pdf

References

1. van Buitenen, Johannes Adrianus Bernardus (1988) “The relative dates of Sankara and Bhaskara”, L. Rocher, Ed., Studies in Indian Literature and Philosophy. Collected articles of J.A.B. van Buitenen, Motilal Banarsidass, Delhi, pp. 187–190.

2. Chernjakov, Aleksei G. (2001) Ontology of Time. Being and Time in Philosophy of Aristoteles, Husserl, Heidegger, High Religion and Philosophy School Press, Saint Petersburg (In Russian).

3. Dasgupta, Surendranath (1975) History of Indian Philosophy, Vol. III, Motilal Banarsidass, Delhi.

4. Grimes, John A. (2009) Concise Dictionary of Indian Philosophy. Sanskrit Terms Defined in English, Indica Books, Delhi.

5. Monier-Williams, Monier A. (1956) A Sanskrit-English Dictionary Etymologucally and Philologically Arranged with Special Indo-European Languages, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

6. Oberhammer, Gerhard (1998) Materialien zur Geshcichte der Ramanuja-Schule IV. Der “Innere Lenker” (Antaryamin) Geschichte eines Theologems, Verlag der Osterreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Vienna (Veroffentlichungen zu den Sprachen und Kulturen Sudasiens, Book 31).

7. Paribok, Andrey V. (2016) “The Ultimate Foundation of the Atman Versus Anatman Issue in Indian Philosophy”, Philosophical crossroad of interaction of civilizations: culture and values, RUDN University, Moscow, pp. 98–115 (in Russian).

8. Potter, Karl H. (1995) Encyclopedia of Indian philosophies. Vol. I: Bibliography, Motilal Banarsidass, Delhi.

9. Pskhu, Rusana V. (2007) Formation of Vishishta Advaita Vedanta on base of “Vedarthasamgrahi” Ramanuja, RUDN University, Moscow (in Russian).

10. Tengelyi, Laszlo (2010) “Husserls methodologischer Transzendentalismus”, C. Ierna, H. Jacobs, F. Mattens, Eds., Philosophy, Phenomenology, Sciences. Essays in Commemoration of Edmund Husserl, Springer Science, Dordrecht.

11. Zahavi, Dan (2003/2009), Husserls Phanomenologie, Mohr Siebeck, Tubingen.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate