- PII
- S004287440005739-7-
- DOI
- 10.31857/S004287440005739-7
- Publication type
- Article
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume / Issue 7
- Pages
- 131-142
- Abstract
The article presents the evolution of substantive and relativistic paradigms in the process of mastering the world and its conceptual representation in the discourse of formation of nonclassical types of rationality and constructivism methodology is analyzed. Discusses the possible trends of solution to the problem of ontological by linguistic and extra-linguistic constructs. Reflection of the cognitive presumptions appear to be one of the ways of overcoming the crisis of substance paradigm and is implemented through explanation of the standard of objectivity and its transformation in non-classical science. The competition of substantive and constructive paradigms is considered on the example of linguistics and nonclassical physics. On the one hand, the dichotomy of the Sapir – Wharf linguistic relativity and the theory of the generative universal grammar of Chomsky are analyzed. On the other hand, the substance-objectivity methodology of classical physics and the constructive-relativistic paradigm of quantum mechanics and particle physics. It is argued that the triumph of relativistic paradigm in physics did not take place and demand quasimaterial constructs. The author substantiates the complementarity of substance-based and relativistic ontological paradigms.
- Keywords
- Substantive and relativistic ontological paradigms; ontologization; objectivity; linguistic relativity of Sapir – Wharf; linguistic universals of Chomsky; relativistic paradigm in physics; complementarity of paradigms
- Date of publication
- 28.07.2019
- Year of publication
- 2019
- Number of purchasers
- 89
- Views
- 881
References
- 1. Boroditsky, Lera (2001) Does language shape thought? English and Mandarin speakers' conceptions of time, Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 43(1), pp. 122.
- 2. Boroditsky, Lera (2003) Linguistic relativity, Nadel, L., Encyclopedia of cognitive science, Macmillan, London, pp. 917922.
- 3. Fock, Vladimir, Einstein, Albert, Podolsky, Boris, Rosen, Nathan, Bohr, Niels (1936) Can we assume that the quantum-mechanical description of physical reality is complete? // Uspekhi fizicheskih nauk, Vol. 16, No 4, pp. 436440 (in Russian).
- 4. von Glasersfeld, Ernst (1996) Radical Constructivism, Palmer Press, London.
- 5. Green, Brian (1999) The Elegant Universe: Superstrings, Hidden Dimensions, and the Quest for the Ultimate Theory, Vintage Books, New York (Russian Translation 2007)
- 6. Hartmann Nicolai (1935) Zur Grundlegung der Ontologie. Berlin: De Gruyter (Russian Translation 2003)
- 7. Kelly, George Alexander (1991) The psychology of personal constructs: Vol. 1. A theory of personality. London: Routledge. (Russian Translation 2000).
- 8. Pruzhinin, Boris (2009) Ratio serviens? Contours of cultural and historical epistemology, ROSSPEN, Moscow (in Russian).
- 9. Quine, Willard Van Orman (1960) Word and Object, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA (Russian Translation 2000).
- 10. Starzhynsky, Valerij (1979) The concept of state and its methodological role in physics, Nauka i tekhnika, Minsk (in Russian).
- 11. Stepin, Vyacheslav S. (2003) Self-Developing systems and post-non-classical rationality, Voprosy Filosofii, Vol. 8 (2003), pp. 517 (in Russian).
- 12. Weinberg, Steven (1994) Dreams of a Final Theory: The Scientists Search for the Ultimate Laws of Nature, Vintage Books, New York (Russian Translation 2008).
