The Modern Radicalism: Phenomenology, Origin and Mechanisms
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
The Modern Radicalism: Phenomenology, Origin and Mechanisms
Annotation
PII
S004287440005730-8-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Vadim Emelin 
Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Alexander Tkhostov
Occupation:  Head of Department of clinical psychology
Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University
Address:  125009, Moscow, Mokhovaya str., 11/9
Edition
Pages
89-98
Abstract

 Radicalism has become one of the most hazardous phenomena in the sociocultural reality. It appears in the different multiformity from the ordinary intolerance up to terrorism. Radicalism is a form of the subjective experience and perception of surrounding reality. That form excludes the critical evaluation and tolerance to another sort of weltanschauung. Given the variety of radicalism manifestations, one may distinguish its universal elements: a black-and-white picture of the world, binary thinking, and the absence of any doubts about the genuineness of the world picture and one’s own behaviour. From the point of view of evolution, radicalism is the extension of struggle for existence.

Moderation is less reasonable evolutionally, and it stems as a particular cultural mechanism, forming a more complicated structure of activity. It involves the elements of voluntary regulation, of the mediation of affects and attractions, alienation, reflection, of a complex non-linear evaluation system, and higher forms of moral. This is a higher transpsychic formation, that is, a holistic cognitive-personal-behavioural style. It is based on the integration of mediated and voluntarily-regulated higher mental functions, and it allows considering the present situation in the context of development, planning, goals, and axiological content. Moderation and radicalism are not a binary opposition but a complex structure enabling a derivative, conscious and voluntarily-cultivated radicalism to exist non-contradictorily, being incorporated in symbolic relations and behaviour.

Keywords
radicalism, moderation, tolerance, postmodernism, cognitive-personal style, cultural-historical psychology
Received
27.07.2019
Date of publication
28.07.2019
Number of purchasers
89
Views
826
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S004287440005730-8-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 03.07.2019
Cite   Download pdf

References

1. Diamond, Jared (1997) Guns, Germs and Steel, W.W. Norton & Company (Russian translation).

2. Emelin, Vadim A. (2018) “From Neo-Luddism to Transhumanism: Singularity and the Vertical Progress or Identity Loss”, Filosofiya Nauki i Tekhniki, Vol. 23, ¹ 1, pp. 103–115 (in Russian).

3. Emelin, Vadim A., Tkhostov, Aleksander Sh. (2013) “The Babylonian Network: The Erosion of the Truth and Identity Diffusion in the Internet Space”, Voprosy Filosofii, ¹ 1, pp. 74–84 (in Russian).

4. Lacan, Jacques (1991) Le seminaire, XVII. L’envers de la psychanalyse. Seuil, Paris.

5. Le Bon, Gustave (1895) La Psychologic des foules, Paris (Russian translation).

6. Leontiev, Aleksey N. (1975) Activity, Consciousness, and Personality, Politizdat, Moscow (in Russian).

7. Engels, Friedrich. Zur Wohnungsfrage. Der Volksstaat (Leipzig), Juni 1872–Februar 1873 (Russian translation).

8. Plamper, Jan (2015) The History of Emotions, Oxford University Press, Oxford (Russian translation).

9. Ravetz, Jerome R. (2006) The No-Nonsense guide to science, New Internationalist, Oxford.

10. Toulmin, Stephen (1982) The Return to Cosmology: Postmodern Science as the Theology of Nature, Univ. of California Press, Berkeley.

11. Vygotsky, Lev S. (2005) Psychology of the Person’s Development, Smysl, Moscow (in Russian).

12. Zimbardo, Philip (2007) The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil, Random house, New York (Russian translation).

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate