RAS History & PhilologyРоссийская история Rossiiskaia istoriia

  • ISSN (Print) 0869-5687
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5790

The Modern Radicalism: Phenomenology, Origin and Mechanisms

PII
S004287440005730-8-
DOI
10.31857/S004287440005730-8
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume / Issue 7
Pages
89-98
Abstract

 Radicalism has become one of the most hazardous phenomena in the sociocultural reality. It appears in the different multiformity from the ordinary intolerance up to terrorism. Radicalism is a form of the subjective experience and perception of surrounding reality. That form excludes the critical evaluation and tolerance to another sort of weltanschauung. Given the variety of radicalism manifestations, one may distinguish its universal elements: a black-and-white picture of the world, binary thinking, and the absence of any doubts about the genuineness of the world picture and one’s own behaviour. From the point of view of evolution, radicalism is the extension of struggle for existence.

Moderation is less reasonable evolutionally, and it stems as a particular cultural mechanism, forming a more complicated structure of activity. It involves the elements of voluntary regulation, of the mediation of affects and attractions, alienation, reflection, of a complex non-linear evaluation system, and higher forms of moral. This is a higher transpsychic formation, that is, a holistic cognitive-personal-behavioural style. It is based on the integration of mediated and voluntarily-regulated higher mental functions, and it allows considering the present situation in the context of development, planning, goals, and axiological content. Moderation and radicalism are not a binary opposition but a complex structure enabling a derivative, conscious and voluntarily-cultivated radicalism to exist non-contradictorily, being incorporated in symbolic relations and behaviour.

Keywords
radicalism, moderation, tolerance, postmodernism, cognitive-personal style, cultural-historical psychology
Date of publication
28.07.2019
Year of publication
2019
Number of purchasers
89
Views
897

References

  1. 1. Diamond, Jared (1997) Guns, Germs and Steel, W.W. Norton & Company (Russian translation).
  2. 2. Emelin, Vadim A. (2018) “From Neo-Luddism to Transhumanism: Singularity and the Vertical Progress or Identity Loss”, Filosofiya Nauki i Tekhniki, Vol. 23, ¹ 1, pp. 103–115 (in Russian).
  3. 3. Emelin, Vadim A., Tkhostov, Aleksander Sh. (2013) “The Babylonian Network: The Erosion of the Truth and Identity Diffusion in the Internet Space”, Voprosy Filosofii, ¹ 1, pp. 74–84 (in Russian).
  4. 4. Lacan, Jacques (1991) Le seminaire, XVII. L’envers de la psychanalyse. Seuil, Paris.
  5. 5. Le Bon, Gustave (1895) La Psychologic des foules, Paris (Russian translation).
  6. 6. Leontiev, Aleksey N. (1975) Activity, Consciousness, and Personality, Politizdat, Moscow (in Russian).
  7. 7. Engels, Friedrich. Zur Wohnungsfrage. Der Volksstaat (Leipzig), Juni 1872–Februar 1873 (Russian translation).
  8. 8. Plamper, Jan (2015) The History of Emotions, Oxford University Press, Oxford (Russian translation).
  9. 9. Ravetz, Jerome R. (2006) The No-Nonsense guide to science, New Internationalist, Oxford.
  10. 10. Toulmin, Stephen (1982) The Return to Cosmology: Postmodern Science as the Theology of Nature, Univ. of California Press, Berkeley.
  11. 11. Vygotsky, Lev S. (2005) Psychology of the Person’s Development, Smysl, Moscow (in Russian).
  12. 12. Zimbardo, Philip (2007) The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil, Random house, New York (Russian translation).
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library