Philosophy as a Dream of the Future
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Philosophy as a Dream of the Future
Annotation
PII
S004287440005729-6-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Wladimir N. Porus 
Occupation: Professor
Affiliation: National Research University “High School of Economy”
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Edition
Pages
82-88
Abstract

In article the project of "synthesis philosophy" offered by M. N. Epstein is considered. The purpose of the project is in giving philosophies an innovative impulse, to save it from tautological infertility, to give it the status of the active participant informative (first of all research) processes. For this purpose it is necessary to redirect the main methodological installation of philosophy - "from the analysis to synthesis". It is not only about "analytical philosophy", but about all range of the philosophical directions. The method of "synthesis" allows a set of interpretations: from synthesis of concepts before the synthesis of philosophical and scientific concepts taking place in a cross-disciplinary research of difficult, multiple-factor processes. In most cases the methodology of synthesis appears as transition, usual for science, from initial abstractions to concrete explanations which receives the generalized description and conceptualization. The problem consists in that how far there can be such generalization. The forecast about approach of such stage in development of philosophy when she acts as the supplier of alternative ontologies for various scientific pictures of the world, can be understood as the romantic dream bringing in the academic discussions about the place of philosophy in culture live feeling and sympathy.

Keywords
Philosophy of Synthesis, analytical philosophy, projective dictionary of philosophy, metaphilosophy
Received
27.07.2019
Date of publication
28.07.2019
Number of purchasers
89
Views
783
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S004287440005729-6-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 03.07.2019
Cite   Download pdf

References

1. Bulgakov, Sergey N. (1993) ‘Chekhov as a thinker’, Bulgakov, Sergey N. Works. Selected articles, vol. 2, Nauka, Moscow (In Russian).

2. Horkheimer, Max, Adorno Theodor V. (1947) Dialektik der Aufklarung. Philosophische Fragmente, Querido, Amsterdam.

3. Porus, Vladimir N. (2019) ‘The Philosophical Status of the Metaphilosophy of Science’, Epistemology and Philosophy of Science, 2019, 56, 2, pp. ? (In Russian).

4. Epstein, Mikhail (2014) ‘On Philosophical Feelings and Actions’, Voprosy Filosofii, Vol. 7 (2014), pp. 167–174 (In Russian).

5. Epstein, Mikhail (2016) From Knowledge to Creativity: How the Humanities Can Change the World), Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ, Moscow, Sankt-Petersburg (In Russian).

6. Epstein, Mikhail N. (2019) ‘From Analysis to Synthesis: on the Vocation of Philosophy in the XXIst century” Voprosy Filosofii, Vol. 7 (2019), pp. ?–? (In Russian).

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate