RAS History & PhilologyРоссийская история Rossiiskaia istoriia

  • ISSN (Print) 0869-5687
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5790

Science Through the Eyes of the Scientists: Max Weber, Henri Poincaré, Ernst Mach

PII
S004287440005720-7-
DOI
10.31857/S004287440005720-7
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume / Issue 7
Pages
23-27
Abstract

How did scientists themselves – representatives of various scientific disciplines in the late XIX – early XX centuries see the nature of science, the activities of a scientist? And how has this view changed in our day? Below we consider how the goal of science, its development and communication with society was understood by the sociologist Max Weber, the mathematician Henri Poincaré and the physicist Ernst Mach. It seems surprising that they all completely disregard the connection of science, its development with material production, the development of technology, or just ignore it. This understanding of science and scientific practicein the beginning of the XX century focused o n the period of development of science, when it was a matter of curious lonely enthusiasts. The development of science in the XX century made it quite clear that science exists in a social context, and society has a decisive influence on its development. Business and the state need science only as a means of developing new technologies. Knowledge, truth, which once were really the priority goal of scientific research, is not needed by the business and the state, and gradually they become just a by-product of applied research.

Keywords
history of science, philosophy of science, contemporary science, Henri Poincaré, Ernst Mach, Max Weber
Date of publication
28.07.2019
Year of publication
2019
Number of purchasers
89
Views
936

References

  1. 1. Veber 1990 ? Veber M. Nauka kak prizvanie i professiya // Veber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. M.: Progress, 1990. C. 707?735 [Weber, Max Wissenschaft als Beruf (Russian translation)].
  2. 2. Makh 2003 ? Makh Eh. Poznanie i zabluzhdenie. M.: BINOM, 2003 [Mach, Ernst Erkenntnis und Irrtum (Russian translation, 2003)].
  3. 3. Puankare 1983 ? Puankare A. Tsennost' nauki // Puankare A. O nauke. M.: Nauka, 1983. S. 153?282 [Poincare, Henry La Valeur de la Science (Russian translation, 1983)].
  4. 4. Lektorskij i dr. 2008 – Lektorskij V.A. i dr. Konstruktivizm v ehpistemologii i naukakh o cheloveke. Materialy kruglogo stola // Voprosy filosofii. 2008. № 3. S. 3–37.
  5. 5. Pruzhinin i dr. 2017 – Pruzhinin B.I. Kommunikatsii v nauke: ehpistemologicheskie, sotsiokul'turnye i infrastrukturnye aspekty. Materialy kruglogo stola // Voprosy filosofii. 2017. № 11. S. 23–57.
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library